<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fast Forward Careers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastforwardcareers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastforwardcareers.com</link>
	<description>Moving you past the competition... FAST!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ATS: Friend or Foe?</title>
		<link>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2009/09/ats-friend-or-foe/</link>
		<comments>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2009/09/ats-friend-or-foe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Daunic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastforwardcareers.com/2009/09/ats-friend-or-foe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Applicant Tracking Systems: The Job Hunter’s Friend or Foe?
by
Pierre G. Daunic, Ph.D.
Every job seeker wants to gain as much exposure to job openings as possible, so by “snail mail” or email, off go résumés to recruiters, job ads, company web pages, or the companies themselves in the hope that someone will review them.  Ah, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Applicant Tracking Systems: The Job Hunter’s Friend or Foe?</strong><br />
by<br />
Pierre G. Daunic, Ph.D.</p>
<p>Every job seeker wants to gain as much exposure to job openings as possible, so by “snail mail” or email, off go résumés to recruiters, job ads, company web pages, or the companies themselves in the hope that someone will review them.  Ah, but unfortunately, in terms of initial screening, that “someone” has been increasingly replaced by an “it”: the Applicant Tracking System (ATS).</p>
<p>You see, thanks mostly to the Internet, companies and recruiters today are being increasingly inundated by résumés sent to them literally at the touch of a button.  So given the need for speed, quality, and economy in the hiring process, enter Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), computer software programs that can capture requested information from paper-based résumés or online applications, and then download it directly into an applicant database.</p>
<p>Thus, when someone sends a Microsoft Word version of his résumé to a company or recruiter, an ATS can scan it without printing it, and store relevant information.  Companies or recruiters can then—using chosen parameters, keywords, or phrases—scan stored résumés when a need arises to fill a certain job posting, saving countless hours once spent in classifying and choosing résumés manually.<br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>The Job Hunter’s Problem … and a Solution</strong><br />
All well and good for an ATS owner, but how can you the job hunter know what parameters the ATS user will enter into his system when looking for a candidate?  How do you know what terms and phrases should be added to your résumé to “catch that mechanical eye”?  Well, you can’t, at least not with certitude.  All you can do is make an educated guess as to what they might be.  And, since many keywords can have variants, choosing—and then integrating them into your résumé—becomes even more difficult.   Let’s use a CFO as an example.  An ATS scan might use any of the following key words or phrases (or others), of which more than one might apply to you:</p>
<p>Job Title:  CFO, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Financial Executive<br />
Years of Experience:  5—10 years of experience, over 10 years of experience, 20+ years, etc.<br />
Expertise:  Mergers, acquisitions, profit and loss, turnarounds, start-ups, budgets, Six Sigma, etc.<br />
Leadership qualities:  Team supervision, “big picture thinker,” visionary, senior manager, Board of Directors, multinational, decision-maker, etc.<br />
Education:  MBA, Ph.D., B.S. in Business Administration, B.S. in Accounting, etc.<br />
Certifications:  CPA, Certified Public Accountant, Chartered Financial Analyst, etc.</p>
<p>As you can see, a list of possible keywords—any of which might be appropriate to you—can be devilishly long, especially when only slight variations are involved.</p>
<p><strong>How to Protect Yourself</strong></p>
<p>First, put all those keywords you think the most important about you in the body of the résumé.  Then put all those of lesser importance in a separate block entitled “Additional keywords” at the bottom of your résumé.  Our CFO example might do it thusly:</p>
<p>Additional Keywords/Phrases:  Accounting, standard cost accounting, spreadsheets, financial reporting, regulatory compliance, accounts receivable/payable, Peachtree, 10 years in upper management, BOD, manufacturing, technology, controller, comptroller, auditor, auditing, divestitures, buyouts, … etc., etc.<br />
[Tip: If you are concerned about your résumé’s appearance, you can “hide” these additional keywords—at least, on an electronic version—by highlighting them, then changing their font color to white. Thus, whether the résumé is displayed on the screen or printed off, those words will be invisible – only the ATS can see them!]</p>
<p>Some final thoughts.  So an ATS can be a foe to you if you don’t realize how it works, but a friend to you if you do.  However, remember that all the keywords or phrases you use must be grounded in truth: you must not add what you have no real knowledge of.  Remember too that although these additional keywords and phrases may help you get past the mechanical ATS screening, your résumé must still be reviewed by a set of human eyes … but, then again, isn’t that what you are after?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2009/09/ats-friend-or-foe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think Function, not Title.</title>
		<link>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2008/05/think-function-not-title/</link>
		<comments>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2008/05/think-function-not-title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resume Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.fastforwardcareers.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Pierre G. Daunic, Ph.D., CCM, CEEC, CCRP, CRW
President, Fast Forward Career Services
&#8220;What&#8217;s in a name? That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet.&#8221;  – Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Sc. 2
Sorry, Shakespeare, but I have to disagree—at least as far as job titles on resumes are concerned. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://new.fastforwardcareers.com/?page_id=2"><em><span style="color: #3366ff;"><strong>by Pierre G. Daunic, Ph.D., CCM, CEEC, CCRP, CRW<br />
President, Fast Forward Career Services</strong></span></em></a></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;What&#8217;s in a name? That which we call a rose</em><em> By any other word would smell as sweet.&#8221;  – Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Sc. 2</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, Shakespeare, but I have to disagree—at least as far as job titles on resumes are concerned. Some of the names given us by our employers don’t smell so sweet at all. In fact, they stink!</p>
<p>Why does it matter what your job title is? Within a company or government institution where your title is readily understood and accepted, it may not. However, if you are forced to seek employment elsewhere, an inappropriate job title may make it that much harder for you to find employment at a worthy level.</p>
<p>Mark, for example, was dubbed an “Office Manager” within a closely held realty company. However, although he did manage an office of some 17 employees, a much better job title for him—which he soon adopted—was “Director of Operations.” Why? Because this was Mark’s true function: he held total responsibility for running all operations within a multimillion-dollar business.</p>
<p><span id="more-3"></span></p>
<h3>How Inappropriate Job Titles Handicap You</h3>
<p>Titles that do not truly represent your function or range of experience can handicap you in any of three ways:</p>
<ol>
<li>The relevancy of your experience may not be readily understood. This is particularly true forthose transitioning from the military. For example, those unfamiliar with military job titles maynot understand that the management responsibilities of an Air Force “Wing Commander” mirrormost of those of a CEO in the civilian sector.</li>
<li>Your amount of experience may be undervalued. For example, I have seen many productionworkers, often with special skills or over 20 years of varied experience, unfairly called just“Assembly Workers” as though they had just started their manufacturing careers yesterday.</li>
<li>Prospective employers may misinterpret your actual level of experience. Hiring managers orhuman resources professionals today often receive hundreds of résumés in answer to a postedposition. With such a large pool of candidates from which to choose, they tend to examine thoseresumes that most closely match their initial parameters. For example, if they are looking for a“Director of Operations,” they will be drawn first—and perhaps solely—to those résumés thatcontain that job title. This tendency is even more pronounced when résumés are scanned forkeywords electronically.</li>
</ol>
<h3>FAQs</h3>
<p><em>“But isn’t it dishonest to give yourself a title you did not earn?”</em></p>
<p>You could also argue it is unfair to be given a job title beneath your capabilities and experience. Regardless, here is a possible way around the problem.  Select the function that you think best exemplifies<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fastforwardcareers.com/2008/05/think-function-not-title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
